Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Raventi is offline
    SG Player
    Raventi's Avatar
    Join Date:
    26 Jun 2012
    Posts:
    14
    Thanked:
    0 in 0 Posts

    New Deathgame Rule??

    I think that it should be implied that if a T wants to play a deathgame, they can't go back from the designated area and if they do then they're dead because it is a deathgame after all. They knew what they were getting into and should follow through with it. If the T didn't hear that it was a deathgame....well then too bad your fault increase the volume you bum.

  2. #2
    Neptune is offline
    Better Call Saul
    Neptune's Avatar
    Join Date:
    3 Oct 2011
    Posts:
    1,520
    Thanked:
    1,295 in 656 Posts
    Donations:
    $10.00
    You can order that once you go to the deathgame you can't go back, but if someone didn't hear it was a deathgame and just thought it was a normal order than that's not allowed, aka they can go back.

  3. #3
    capp'n is offline
    I just want to go
    capp'n's Avatar
    Join Date:
    8 Jan 2013
    Location:
    FL
    Posts:
    1,052
    Thanked:
    342 in 213 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Raventi View Post
    I think that it should be implied that if a T wants to play a deathgame, they can't go back from the designated area and if they do then they're dead because it is a deathgame after all. They knew what they were getting into and should follow through with it. If the T didn't hear that it was a deathgame....well then too bad your fault increase the volume you bum.
    CTs are the ones who say whether they can go back or not, if they don't say it then that's their choice to be lenient to the terorrists. It shouldn't be a rule because it's just an order CTs give, nothing like "If you have a primary, instant KOS".
    "i dont need to speak spanish, i need to get pussy" -wertles

    I'm in first class but I feel like coach

  4. Thanked by 1 user:
    Elemental (14 Jul 2015)

  5. #4
    Toyz is offline
    Server Administrator
    Toyz's Avatar
    Join Date:
    16 Jan 2011
    Location:
    Canadia
    Posts:
    97
    Thanked:
    25 in 14 Posts
    Donations:
    $10.00
    Quote Originally Posted by Raventi View Post
    I think that it should be implied that if a T wants to play a deathgame, they can't go back from the designated area and if they do then they're dead because it is a deathgame after all. They knew what they were getting into and should follow through with it. If the T didn't hear that it was a deathgame....well then too bad your fault increase the volume you bum.
    man, just tell them not to go back. I love my vanilla PB >=(

  6. #5
    Goku is offline
    SG Professional

    Join Date:
    5 Feb 2012
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Posts:
    562
    Thanked:
    54 in 45 Posts
    Donations:
    $95.00
    Quote Originally Posted by Toyz View Post
    man, just tell them not to go back...

    I'd like to take this moment to point out that it should be slayable if a CT DOES NOT state that you can't go back, then kills a T going back and saying "No going back".

    So many times it will go like this:

    CT: Line up on the line if you want to play a death game

    T's line up

    One T decides to go back

    CT kills T


    CT: No going back.

    I understand if it is stated before hand "no going back" but I don't think the CT should be able to kill the T and THEN say no going back. Should at least warning shot the T and if he still tries to go back THEN kill him.
    Leave for a few months, come back and Extreme Potatoes is admin. Leave and come back, he's AO. Leave and come back he's back to admin. Maybe if I leave again he'll be perm'd...

  7. #6
    Toyz is offline
    Server Administrator
    Toyz's Avatar
    Join Date:
    16 Jan 2011
    Location:
    Canadia
    Posts:
    97
    Thanked:
    25 in 14 Posts
    Donations:
    $10.00
    Quote Originally Posted by Goku View Post
    I'd like to take this moment to point out that it should be slayable if a CT DOES NOT state that you can't go back, then kills a T going back and saying "No going back".

    So many times it will go like this:

    CT: Line up on the line if you want to play a death game

    T's line up

    One T decides to go back

    CT kills T


    CT: No going back.

    I understand if it is stated before hand "no going back" but I don't think the CT should be able to kill the T and THEN say no going back. Should at least warning shot the T and if he still tries to go back THEN kill him.
    Yea i agree, that is slayable.

  8. Thanked by 1 user:
    Goku (14 Jul 2015)

  9. #7
    BoM is offline
    Banned

    Join Date:
    28 Feb 2010
    Location:
    Jen's Pants
    Posts:
    1,377
    Thanked:
    588 in 326 Posts
    Donations:
    $15.00
    Quote Originally Posted by Raventi View Post
    I think that it should be implied that if a T wants to play a deathgame, they can't go back from the designated area and if they do then they're dead because it is a deathgame after all. They knew what they were getting into and should follow through with it. If the T didn't hear that it was a deathgame....well then too bad your fault increase the volume you bum.
    Its always been implied, simply because it is an order that was given. While yes the deathgame is optional, the location and movements are orders, and should be treated just as normal orders. The only difference is that its a deathgame taking place along with the orders.

    Quote Originally Posted by Neptune View Post
    You can order that once you go to the deathgame you can't go back, but if someone didn't hear it was a deathgame and just thought it was a normal order than that's not allowed, aka they can go back.
    This is the only time I'd be okay with this, and warning shots should still be given at least, but technically its the CTs choice still. If an order is given and someone didn't hear it, then dies AFTER WARNING SHOTS AND REPEATED ORDERS then its treated just as if it was a normal situation without a deathgame involved.. If someone is just mowing down people running back, then its slayable. Terrorists should also say something before they just run back, instead of making up their own rules.

    Quote Originally Posted by capp'n View Post
    CTs are the ones who say whether they can go back or not, if they don't say it then that's their choice to be lenient to the terorrists. It shouldn't be a rule because it's just an order CTs give, nothing like "If you have a primary, instant KOS".
    ^This, essentially CTs choice, T's should clean their ears out

    Quote Originally Posted by Goku View Post
    I'd like to take this moment to point out that it should be slayable if a CT DOES NOT state that you can't go back, then kills a T going back and saying "No going back".

    So many times it will go like this:

    CT: Line up on the line if you want to play a death game

    T's line up

    One T decides to go back

    CT kills T


    CT: No going back.

    I understand if it is stated before hand "no going back" but I don't think the CT should be able to kill the T and THEN say no going back. Should at least warning shot the T and if he still tries to go back THEN kill him.
    CTs don't have to state it, it should be treated as a normal order, i.e. still use warning shots and repeat order if prompted. Its a courtesy for the CTs to actual say "No going back", but I agree warning shots are still required.

    All in all this comes down to the much bigger issue at hand in PB.
    1. People.....making....up....THEIR OWN FUCKING RULES
    2. Lack of communication/both CTs and Ts doing things without communicating.

    Doing either of these will ensue chaos as well as create odd rule conflicts like this. A lot of PB comes down to communication, and without it shit like this will keep happening, if not get worse. People are just playing PB as a do what you want and only half play the gamemode, not to mention actually following the rules. The reason CSS PB had implied rules, is because the regs of PB communicated, they developed courtesies like this one to make the game more enjoyable and understandable for everybody.

    There is a level of rule discussion and clear cut clarification that can take place, however at some point it will come down to the regs who frequent PB. There will always things that can be done, but don't have to be done.

  10. Thanked by 2 users:
    5L4DE (15 Jul 2015), Goku (14 Jul 2015)

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •