Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Interstellar

  1. #1
    narwhales123 is offline
    SG Player
    narwhales123's Avatar
    Join Date:
    21 Aug 2013
    Location:
    right behind you
    Posts:
    59
    Thanked:
    3 in 3 Posts

    Interstellar

    Wow... and thats my official review it's a total mind fuck and has a great twist at the end a lot of the plot is kinda bs but worth sitting through everything is connected and sooo cool

  2. #2
    Vick is offline
    Banned

    Join Date:
    24 Aug 2012
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Posts:
    1,569
    Thanked:
    306 in 263 Posts
    Donations:
    $20.00
    Haven't seen it yet, but I heard it was good from a lot of people. I'll have to watch it soon!!

  3. #3
    Tsuna is offline
    SG Addict
    Tsuna's Avatar
    Join Date:
    23 Jul 2012
    Location:
    J
    Posts:
    581
    Thanked:
    187 in 109 Posts
    Donations:
    $50.00
    I guess I'll have to watch this, watched Mockingjay and Horrible Bosses 2 so far :D





  4. #4
    XeNo is offline
    Baghdad ass up
    XeNo's Avatar
    Join Date:
    22 Jul 2008
    Location:
    Caution
    Posts:
    2,657
    Thanked:
    1,080 in 402 Posts
    Donations:
    $566.00
    Plot is only bs if you look at it from a "Are they trying to stretch this theory" or not.

    Looking at it from a scientific aspect, it's rather cool theory they worked with and built on. The only "this is a bit of a stretch" is the part just before the end. Though they bring up an interesting idea that it is a creation from light-years ahead of our time, a civilization that has learned to harness those capabilities are able to construct something like that. The implementation of it is rather ingenious when they explain the 4d/5d effects of gravity.

    Other than that small (10-15 minutes) portion of the movie, the rest is theoretical possibilities and rather cool the way they laid the plot out.
    Last edited by XeNo; 2 Dec 2014 at 08:35pm.

  5. #5
    vivian pls is offline
    Boots and pants and boots
    vivian pls's Avatar
    Join Date:
    9 May 2009
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Posts:
    2,095
    Thanked:
    82 in 44 Posts
    10/10 I cried. Would watch again.

  6. Thanked by 1 user:
    Mandeemoo007 (4 Dec 2014)

  7. #6
    Dirk is offline
    Banned

    Join Date:
    14 Jul 2010
    Location:
    NC
    Posts:
    1,612
    Thanked:
    222 in 177 Posts
    Donations:
    $75.00
    I need to catch this while it is still in theaters. I guess this one is Imax worthy?

  8. #7
    Elemental is offline
    I like kitties.
    Elemental's Avatar
    Join Date:
    6 Jan 2014
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Posts:
    1,068
    Thanked:
    158 in 113 Posts
    Donations:
    $307.00
    Quote Originally Posted by XeNo View Post
    Looking at it from a scientific aspect, it's rather cool theory they worked with and built on. The only "this is a bit of a stretch" is the part just before the end. Though they bring up an interesting idea that it is a creation from light-years ahead of our time,
    Light years is not a measure of time ~.~





  9. #8
    Rilex is offline
    SG Professional
    Rilex's Avatar
    Join Date:
    4 Aug 2013
    Location:
    Viper City, Florida
    Posts:
    422
    Thanked:
    102 in 86 Posts
    Donations:
    $55.00
    Quote Originally Posted by Dirkjr View Post
    I need to catch this while it is still in theaters. I guess this one is Imax worthy?
    Not necessarily, but I did it anyway and I think it was worth it. Loud af tho
    •_•)
    ( •_•)>⌐■-■
    (⌐■_■)

  10. #9
    Motox is offline
    SG Addict
    Motox's Avatar
    Join Date:
    22 Sep 2013
    Location:
    NYC
    Posts:
    530
    Thanked:
    181 in 126 Posts
    Donations:
    $40.00
    Quote Originally Posted by Elemental View Post
    Light years is not a measure of time ~.~
    Thanks, Mr. astrophysicist.

    Great movie, not my favorite performance by McConaughey but none the less it was one of his best. I guess at the end it did seem a little far-fetched, I think a well-known astrophysicist helped guide the scientific portion of the movie but I can't find a source for who it was. None the less, great movie.

  11. #10
    XeNo is offline
    Baghdad ass up
    XeNo's Avatar
    Join Date:
    22 Jul 2008
    Location:
    Caution
    Posts:
    2,657
    Thanked:
    1,080 in 402 Posts
    Donations:
    $566.00
    Quote Originally Posted by Elemental View Post
    Light years is not a measure of time ~.~
    It's an expression.

    The way the expression works is like this: Take given measurement and translate to amount of time it would take to cover said distance realistically, in a context for which the expression was used.

    So if someone said, for example, "This is miles beyond (Could also be simply "beyond" since it can be taken as a measurement given the context, "Beyond what?" Beyond the gate, beyond the fence, further past what said person is using as a point of reference, which is a distance expression if you think of it in this context) what I've imagined is possible." You would take the given measurement (miles) and assume they meant a measurement of time. So you would take the realistic perspective of how long it would take said person to travel said miles, in scale to what they're expressing as "miles beyond".

    If they're in a state of utter bewilderment, you can safely assume that "miles" is translated into "great length", and add said length to a measurement of time, to understand the context in which a measurement that was not specifically time was used to describe time. The result is that the "distance of time" is a very long time, beyond the amount of time in which the person originally was thinking was in the realm of possibility (as far as they could see, which is a measurement of distance, hence going "beyond" that would mean it is surpassing their expectations, which is just a form of measuring realistic possibility, which I don't think we need to get into right now, we'll just deal with translating an expression of distance to an expression of time).

    So given the context in which I used a form of distance (light years) to represent a measurement of time, we can safely assume by what I just explained, that I was expressing time with a parallel measurement of distance (This case, light years being a very, very, very far distance) that the amount of time I was expressing is a "very, very, very long time".

    Here is some math for you, if it helps: A light year is (9.4607 × 1012 km (nearly 6 trillion miles)), so we take ~6 trillion and put in formation of time, how long would it take to go said distance. The average space shuttle speed is 17,500 miles per hour, this speed to go ~6 trillion miles is:
    6trillion / 17,500 = ~342,857,142.857(repeating, of course yayvideogamerreferences!) hours - We're on our way to giving a distance a relative amount of time! Woohoo!
    342,857,142.857 hours / 24 hours in a day = ~14,285,714.286 days - One more step!
    14,285,714.286 days / 365.25 (leap year) days in a year = ~39,112.154 years.

    So we can now reasonably say that my statement could be translated to "...several approximately thirty-nine thousand, one hundred and twelve point one-five-four years ahead of our time." But doesn't it just sound better to say "...light years ahead of our time."?

    I'm glad I could assist you in understanding this very common expression of using a distance that is not time to explain a measurement of time.

  12. Thanked by 2 users:
    Minus (3 Dec 2014), Rilex (3 Dec 2014)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •