Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 96

Thread: Realistically

  1. #11
    Ultramarine is offline
    SG Addict
    Ultramarine's Avatar
    Join Date:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    1,046
    Thanked:
    392 in 127 Posts
    No nukes involved, then the US would win, Russia lacks the naval capabilities to launch a naval invasion of North America, And Modern Warfare's Scenario is so fucked up and full of holes it aint even funny. In no way would an air borne invasion, like the one used in that game, would work.

  2. #12
    Lordcrazy is offline
    SG Addict
    Lordcrazy's Avatar
    Join Date:
    1 Jul 2009
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Posts:
    933
    Thanked:
    11 in 11 Posts
    Well apparently none of you have read Tom Clancy's book the Bear and the Dragon. Russia's military is not well trained and they do not have the technological advances of the United States Military. The United States would win unless the Chinese or nukes got involved.

  3. #13
    Desum is offline
    SG Addict
    Desum's Avatar
    Join Date:
    20 Jul 2008
    Location:
    Michigan
    Posts:
    895
    Thanked:
    107 in 60 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Killer View Post
    If Nuclear weapons were involved, no one would win. It will just be a massive shit storm. But Guinness world record 2010 claims China is the strongest atm.
    ...You get your facts about political and military standings from Guinness?

  4. Thanked by 1 user:
    Bad Dog (6 Mar 2010)

  5. #14
    Delirium is offline
    SG Addict

    Join Date:
    10 Mar 2009
    Location:
    Dallas
    Posts:
    1,415
    Thanked:
    140 in 96 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lordcrazy View Post
    Well apparently none of you have read Tom Clancy's book the Bear and the Dragon. Russia's military is not well trained and they do not have the technological advances of the United States Military. The United States would win unless the Chinese or nukes got involved.
    Well apparently you haven't read the post in this thread, only a couple of people have hinted towards Russia even remotely winning.

    As for those of you saying China would win, this is USA vs Russia, not USA and allies vs Russia and allies.

  6. #15
    Farmer Mick is offline
    Banned

    Join Date:
    25 Jul 2007
    Location:
    England
    Posts:
    1,531
    Thanked:
    281 in 140 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Epidemic View Post
    Well apparently you haven't read the post in this thread, only a couple of people have hinted towards Russia even remotely winning.

    As for those of you saying China would win, this is USA vs Russia, not USA and allies vs Russia and allies.
    so your telling me that if Russia and USA went to war it would remain Russia vs USA??

    i doubt that there is always allies

  7. #16
    Delirium is offline
    SG Addict

    Join Date:
    10 Mar 2009
    Location:
    Dallas
    Posts:
    1,415
    Thanked:
    140 in 96 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mr mick View Post
    so your telling me that if Russia and USA went to war it would remain Russia vs USA??

    i doubt that there is always allies
    I'm not saying that, but there would be to many possibilities to think of if that happened. Say China does get involved on Russia's side, Which European countries will come to our aid? And which side will the UN take? All of these would be major factors in a war between the US and Russia, just like who invades who, or if nuclear weapons are used.

    To be completely honest, I think we should be worrying less about Russia and more about the rouge nations that have nuclear weapons, like North Korea, and Iran.

  8. #17
    Bad Dog is offline
    SG Addict
    Bad Dog's Avatar
    Join Date:
    7 Feb 2009
    Location:
    B& L&
    Posts:
    2,963
    Thanked:
    436 in 259 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lordcrazy View Post
    Well apparently none of you have read Tom Clancy's book the Bear and the Dragon. Russia's military is not well trained and they do not have the technological advances of the United States Military. The United States would win unless the Chinese or nukes got involved.
    Because Tom Clancy is the go to place for military information, I totally forgot it was just a bunch of crappy books made for 40 year old dads.
    Quote Originally Posted by PotshotPolka View Post
    Your opinion is your sacred right. It's also my right to suggest your sacred right go fall into a trash compactor filled with HIV infected needles.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jager View Post
    whoops smell that? thats your ban coming in hot and greasy.
    Odd Future.

  9. #18
    Desum is offline
    SG Addict
    Desum's Avatar
    Join Date:
    20 Jul 2008
    Location:
    Michigan
    Posts:
    895
    Thanked:
    107 in 60 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Epidemic View Post
    I'm not saying that, but there would be to many possibilities to think of if that happened. Say China does get involved on Russia's side, Which European countries will come to our aid? And which side will the UN take? All of these would be major factors in a war between the US and Russia, just like who invades who, or if nuclear weapons are used.

    To be completely honest, I think we should be worrying less about Russia and more about the rouge nations that have nuclear weapons, like North Korea, and Iran.
    Iran's space program is still focusing on sending classroom pets into space. I think we'll be a'ight for awhile.


    And on a side-note, no matter what happens in World War 3, I think we can all agree Canada won't do shit.

  10. #19
    trakaill is offline
    SG Addict
    trakaill's Avatar
    Join Date:
    30 Nov 2007
    Location:
    Florida
    Posts:
    2,986
    Thanked:
    173 in 126 Posts
    why is chinas army so powerful?? They put one out of 3 babies in the armed forces or something?
    The US has by far the most advanced technology in warfare! The f22 by it self would kick some serious ass.. the f15 and fa18 were already the best planes in the world and the f22 has like 8 to 10 times their killing power according to some stuff Ive read/seen..

    That and other things would lead me to believe that russia has no chance..
    China, I dont know about them but they seem they would have a huge amount of people making it quite advantageous to them

    Remember though the US spends on defense more than 128 countries together or something close to that... thats a lot of money!!!


  11. #20
    Prez is offline
    SG Addict
    Prez's Avatar
    Join Date:
    26 Jul 2009
    Location:
    Canada
    Posts:
    3,962
    Thanked:
    881 in 504 Posts
    Donations:
    $177.00
    Wikipedia for the win?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...y_expenditures

    Shows that the USA spends a ton-load more than the 2nd most, which is China. Mind you, this is 2008..

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...mber_of_troops

    Apparently Iran has the most, then China, although Iran has 11 million people classified as Paramilitary... If you class it by active troops, China is first, US second.

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •