Realistically

[Toxin]

Whoever invents a antimatter bomb. Too bad building one would bankrupt the earth. You wouldn't want to fuck with someone with a bomb that powerful.

Anti-matter already exists. It is only super fucking expensive, highly concentrated excellent quality uranium is much more affordable than anti-matter. 1 gram of anti matter runs around $150 million, and 1 g of anti matter only exterminates 1 gram of matter... big waste of money.

[Mutiny]

Who would, if ever, win a war between the United States of America or the Russian Federation? Attempt to reason please.

With current technology that both countries have invested into nuclear bombs i'm sure we'd all end up dead

[Toxin]

With current technology that both countries have invested into nuclear bombs i'm sure we'd all end up dead

Good job restating what basically ever single user in the last 10 pages has mentioned.

[trakaill]

meh not gonna argue...http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/20...raptor_070730/

and one that was shot down at this point the plane was fighting against many f15s...

144-0 kdr beat that!!

[SilentGuns]

Anti-matter already exists. It is only super fucking expensive, highly concentrated excellent quality uranium is much more affordable than anti-matter. 1 gram of anti matter runs around $150 million, and 1 g of anti matter only exterminates 1 gram of matter... big waste of money.

yea , I know. But the bomb need a containment field so it wont touch with matter untill needed. Thats the key.
I also think that anti-matter costs around 60 trillion per gram and its actaully much more effetive I think. Not 1:1.

[Toxin]

Anti-matter is currently contained in a special container. A magnetive field keeps the anti-matter flowing in a vacuum-sealed container. And no, the effectiveness is 1:1. The density is what determines how heavy a material is. Unless we can create anti-matter from much denser materials, the price of anti-matter will not drop anytime soon.