Or, if they're going to commit barbaric acts, then they should receive a barbaric punishment. Bring out the iron maiden!
Printable View
Liberalism in the world is what allows people to do these things and get away with it. Good example: Read news on the jury selection for the Boston Marathon bomber. This kid was bent on detonating bombs at two highly populated areas of the race in order to conduct as much death as possible. People are still saying they don't believe in the death penalty. So my question is this: People with such little regard to innocent human life as to kill so many (also referring to France attack), do they deserve to spend life in prison, with free health care, free meals, free clothes and a bed? If they should spend time locked up it should be in a cage 3'x3', where they stand out in the elements and given only enough food/water to survive. Otherwise, get rid of them. They give nothing to society. Nuke the middle east. WHA? WHA? Had to be said. Just do it. Really. Wipem out. Otherwise they'll spend another 1000 years trying to wipe eachother out. A little friendly nudge wouldn't hurt.
Not worried about money, because this country spends BILLIONS dropping bombs on savages. It's about allowing people like that to carry on with their lives feeling as if they had accomplished something. Bet you're also the type to allow someone to break into your home, murder your family, and hand them your tv on their way out. LOOOOSER.
0/10
Two ways of punishment I would support:
1. Labor camps
2. Something my country did in the 30s: the person was given a choice between suicide by poison or just get hanged.
BUT DAS 2 BABAARIC WE NED 2 BE KIND 2 ONE ANTOHER.
Put a single bullet in the cranium. Execution costs: $.25-2.50 depending on the round used.