COD5

[LVG]

Let me say this straight FAIL, once again Treyarch made anoher fail game was playing today on xbox atm theres like 3 maps, ou cant crouch in water all the fractions speek english (with accents) they all have thompsons for some reason? i think all weapons are the same and it takes like 3 seconds to go up a rank tbh ts pretty dam boring the only reasonably good thing is the tanks also with like recon they have dogs BLOODY DOGS which are fake as f*** and the artillery makes a annoying noise when the shells come down z0mg its so annoying

my opinion don't buy the fail game (used beta)

[Havok]

Let me say this straight FAIL, once again Treyarch made anoher fail game was playing today on xbox atm theres like 3 maps, ou cant crouch in water all the fractions speek english (with accents) they all have thompsons for some reason? i think all weapons are the same and it takes like 3 seconds to go up a rank tbh ts pretty dam boring the only reasonably good thing is the tanks also with like recon they have dogs BLOODY DOGS which are fake as f*** and the artillery makes a annoying noise when the shells come down z0mg its so annoying

my opinion don't buy the fail game (used beta)

You have to remember it's a beta.

The whole purpose of the demo you were given to play was for opinions, to highlight bugs with the game and show them where they need to re-address aspects.

Perhaps putting it more politely and into a questionnaire or email to them would be more productive.

[LVG]

Havok... its the makers of cod3 there not gona change much maybe the start weapons

[andre1028]

Yeah I don't trust Treyarch. They are the shittiest developers in the history of video games. I hope it doesn't end up like
E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial

[Josh]

Havok... its the makers of cod3 there not gona change much maybe the start weapons

you know they only had like a 6 month window to make cod3, when they have had over 2 years to make cod5....

[Kennith]

I heard COD5 is a downgrade from COD4.

[Italian Jew]

It would be hard to upgrade COD4 with a WWII themed sequel not only because it was pretty damn awesome, but because modern warfare isn't as overly done as WWII. COD5 might be a decent/good game, but my guess is it will not be as great as COD4.

[Henrik]

i heard that COD5 will not be createt by the same who made COD4

[LegalSmash]

It would be hard to upgrade COD4 with a WWII themed sequel not only because it was pretty damn awesome, but because modern warfare isn't as overly done as WWII. COD5 might be a decent/good game, but my guess is it will not be as great as COD4.

Im inclined to agree here, after 10 different WW2 FPS games, we moved into "modern warfare" and it was good. It was awesome, and by God, it was new, not rehashed endlessly.

Don't get me wrong, I LOVE COD 1 and 2, and the expansion for 1, I even liked Big Red One... but shit man, 6 WW2 games by the same developer, of which 3-4 of them rehashed the SAME battles OVER and OVER again DOES get old.

The pacific has been done before, horribly, by EA and the MOH series, twice.

The problem with the pacific is similar to the problem with BF vietnam: its not something that can be done with the same sort of straight forward gameplay as 1,2,3, or 4. Additionally, the style of jap combat does not really lead to a decent shooter, unless you are thinking of a "black hawk down" style game with droves of inferior units to shoot while ducking loads of incoming fire. Part of what made C4 a good game was the AI being generally semi intelligent, and the story line not absolutely sucking balls. For the first time in a COD game, it was followed throughout, rather than 4 different missions,kind of like in BRO.

That being said, while its true the beta will not be the finished product, I think that its a fair show of what IS to come, and if it sucks, it may foreshadow a shitty game, but then it may amaze us all as well.

I know this much: I may rent it, but not buy it

[Joeytron]

i love 4, i dont think anything will top it