View Full Version : New Rule ?

11 Jun 2015, 05:01pm
Might it be an idea to add the following rule, or something like it;
" The CT initiating a death game is the designated shooter."

basically meaning that the CT starting the death game with a group of Ts is the one who calls the shots about who lives and dies, and other CTs cannot shoot them.

Quite often I want to play a death game with some T's and then a random CT pops one in the head for assuming that guy lost, yet most of the time those CTs did not hear the rules properly, or falsely shoot the T =/

Black Rain
11 Jun 2015, 05:06pm
Yes, please I agree. This would hopefully create less freekills when properly enforced and less chaos when people learn it's a rule. I think it's a great idea

11 Jun 2015, 06:59pm
That would make a lot of sense. One time I watched a deathgame where it was a race and CT's ended up killing two T's before the race was even finished just because one guy was a little more ahead than the others even though they still had a chance to bypass him to take the lead. The CT that was seemly in charge of the deathgame was confused but in the end just went with it. Maybe it can cut down on dumb stuff like that.

Nuclear Onion
12 Jun 2015, 03:34am
It sounds like it should be implied anyways, the only reason someone else should be shooting the death game players is if they end up rebelling and the lead CT can't handle it. Those CTs should be watching the Ts not playing the deathgame. I feel like this can be more of an unwritten rule.

Another CA(s)/AO opinion would seem legit though.

12 Jun 2015, 07:01am
It would be too annoying to enforce IMO because usually people aren't getting it wrong when they kill that one T, and if they do then you can just slay them.

12 Jun 2015, 07:15am
I don't feel like this should be a new rule, mainly because the situation you presented would just fall under "freekilling" and the person should be punish accordingly.

12 Jun 2015, 03:49pm
If another CT kills somebody for the wrong reason then it's a freekill which is already a rule... The scenario you said in your post is just a freekill and doesn't sound like it needs another full rule.

Nuclear Onion
13 Jun 2015, 05:21am
What the three above me said, if this happens just slay the guy who fucked up and tell him to back off for the next deathgame. Maybe even respawn the one free killed so they can continue the deathgame.