PDA

View Full Version : spray rules



Runawayz
14 Jun 2009, 10:41am
i was asked to change my spray it was a jap woman with a saying underneath that said "b/c children are illegal" girl in the pic was of age, her tits were showing but i was wondering where i might find the rules on sprays so i know what i can use.
thanks!

Caution
14 Jun 2009, 11:51am
"An admin can deem any spray inappropriate and ask you to stop using it."

Basically, if an admin asks you to stop using it, then stop. Some allow porn while others won't.

Shadowex3
14 Jun 2009, 12:27pm
"An admin can deem any spray inappropriate and ask you to stop using it."

Basically, if an admin asks you to stop using it, then stop. Some allow porn while others won't.

Who doesn't? I haven't met one yet that bans vanilla porn.

Caution
14 Jun 2009, 12:43pm
Who doesn't? I haven't met one yet that bans vanilla porn.

Off the top of my head I can only name Bubbles, but I've seen several that don't.

Metal
14 Jun 2009, 03:23pm
Admins have the power to see whos spray is whos and we cant kick or ban

Bad Dog
14 Jun 2009, 03:29pm
Only sprays I have seen deemed "innapropriate" besides Nazi ones..were this one dude had these anime style sprays, he called it "Guro" or somthing..and it was basically child cannablism in cutsey art form. Yuuuckkk

Caution
14 Jun 2009, 03:34pm
Admins have the power to see whos spray is whos and we cant kick or ban

I'm assuming you mean can*.

Shadowex3
14 Jun 2009, 03:55pm
Barring something illegal or truly disgusting/offensive (goatse, racist crap, etc) the policy is asking you not to use it then they can kick or give a small ban at their discretion.

And yeah I've never seen "normal" porn banned even by the female admins, actually my "haha that's not a girl" sprays have apparently gained a fanclup O_o

Metal
14 Jun 2009, 05:14pm
Only sprays I have seen deemed "innapropriate" besides Nazi ones..were this one dude had these anime style sprays, he called it "Guro" or somthing..and it was basically child cannablism in cutsey art form. Yuuuckkk

Guro * Anime pics with death, aka blood and the insides coming out.
Yes that a ban right on spot or should be, and BadDog how did you know it was Guro?
and dont ask me how i know lol


Ban types of icons-
Gay
Guro
Racist
anything with bad images.
a lot more

Runawayz
14 Jun 2009, 05:41pm
Off the top of my head I can only name Bubbles, but I've seen several that don't.

actually fuze asked me to change it no offense but i believe its because he is so young.. it was only a jap girl sitting in a chair with her tits hangin out and the phrase...

Ms. Blargh
14 Jun 2009, 05:43pm
I dont care about naked chicks and such as long as its not hardcore porn.

But Anything:
Racist
Gross
with children in a lewd way
and gay porn

I Do not tolerate.

Runawayz
14 Jun 2009, 05:47pm
I dont care about naked chicks and such as long as its not hardcore porn.

But Anything:
Racist
Gross
with children in a lewd way
and gay porn

I Do not tolerate.

i guess mine could have been partially offensive with the phrase attached "because children are illegal" but i didn't want to make any bad blood so i changed it immediately no big deal just wanted to be sure i didn't spray anything offensive again

Caution
14 Jun 2009, 05:54pm
So why should straight porn be allowed but not gay?

I'm not gay at all, but I find it very hypocritical.

Ms. Blargh
14 Jun 2009, 05:57pm
So why should straight porn be allowed but not gay?

I'm not gay at all, but I find it very hypocritical.

I said i dont tolerate hardcore porn <-straight
I dont really see naked chicks as porn.
I mean if the spray was just some naked guy then fine
but most gay sprays ive seen are pretty hard core

tinkerbell
14 Jun 2009, 05:59pm
So why should straight porn be allowed but not gay?

I'm not gay at all, but I find it very hypocritical.

like it says in the rules," if an admin finds any spray to be offensive they can ask the player to change it"

obvious bans are racism, child porn, after that its under the admins descression

matt 187
14 Jun 2009, 06:05pm
i was asked to change my spray it was a jap woman with a saying underneath that said "b/c children are illegal" girl in the pic was of age, her tits were showing but i was wondering where i might find the rules on sprays so i know what i can use.
thanks!

could we see the pic? to judge.....

Caution
14 Jun 2009, 06:15pm
I said i dont tolerate hardcore porn <-straight
I dont really see naked chicks as porn.
I mean if the spray was just some naked guy then fine
but most gay sprays ive seen are pretty hard core

Nah I'm not talking about you, I just mean in general.

Ms. Blargh
14 Jun 2009, 06:42pm
ok but yah i can see how its hypocritical

Bad Dog
14 Jun 2009, 06:49pm
Fullmetal did you read my post the player said it was called Guro. And blarg..I bet the gay porn you see IS very hardcore. Ive seen your internet history :P

Ms. Blargh
14 Jun 2009, 06:54pm
lmao you know i meant in game :P

Bad Dog
14 Jun 2009, 07:09pm
lmao you know i meant in game :P

Ya..."OK"

Metal
14 Jun 2009, 07:50pm
Well- it seems we all know whats good and bad.
Sorry BDog- lol did you google it when he told you

Bad Dog
14 Jun 2009, 10:15pm
Well- it seems we all know whats good and bad.
Sorry BDog- lol did you google it when he told you

No!! As i said twice he told me!!! Im not into Guro contrary to popular belief! JEEEEZEE

Desum
14 Jun 2009, 11:03pm
No!! As i said twice he told me!!! Im not into Guro contrary to popular belief! JEEEEZEE

Careful, Bad Dog. It starts with Guro, then you wanna see the real life thing.. And a serial killer is born.

chaoslee12
15 Jun 2009, 06:44am
RESPECT THE ADMINS RESPECT IT lol do what they say about sprays or suffer dire consiquences

Fast Bullet
15 Jun 2009, 02:27pm
and gay porn

I Do not tolerate.

2 Lesbians in action ?
I would give + rep to the owner of the spray XD

Ms. Blargh
15 Jun 2009, 02:53pm
2 Lesbians in action ?
I would give + rep to the owner of the spray XD
>.> its the male gay porn thats gross

usually the lesbian stuff isnt to graphic

sheriff
15 Jun 2009, 04:21pm
having furry sprays should be a permabannable offense.

Caution
15 Jun 2009, 05:16pm
having furry sprays should be a permabannable offense.

LOL

andre1028
15 Jun 2009, 05:20pm
To be honest if you see me in the server you won't have to worry about getting banned for nude sprays but I don't tolerate hardcore pornography sprays and hentai. I personally think that if you pleasure yourself to penciled pictures you really need a reality check.

Caution
15 Jun 2009, 05:26pm
I personally think that if you pleasure yourself to penciled pictures you really need a reality check.

100% agree.

Dracula
15 Jun 2009, 05:32pm
To be honest if you see me in the server you won't have to worry about getting banned for nude sprays but I don't tolerate hardcore pornography sprays and hentai. I personally think that if you pleasure yourself to penciled pictures you really need a reality check.

This very very much.

ReneGade
16 Jun 2009, 05:18am
I personally do not put up with any kind of porn sprays because I know i have polayed cs since i was in 6th grade ad i know many kids much younger play now. Though i will never issue a ban for them, I will always ask both through spray tracker and over chat to stop using the spray, and if it persists just keep kicking you until you stop using it. Now if you get an attitude with me or start trying argue about it then it shifts realms.

RiotJavelin
16 Jun 2009, 08:08am
I don't care about porn sprays that are what I call "PG" porn sprays. (ex. chick showing her boobs and ass) because seriously everyone has boobs and an ass (some more than others). I start to get "offended" when people post pictures of guys and girls privates, mainly because we do have of young people who do play on our servers.

Shadowex3
16 Jun 2009, 08:23am
And that's where people need to do a reality check and look at the number on the side of the game.

sheriff
16 Jun 2009, 10:43am
I personally do not put up with any kind of porn sprays because I know i have polayed cs since i was in 6th grade ad i know many kids much younger play now.

the game's rated M for Mature, meaning 17 and up.

so it's not someone's fault for putting up porn sprays and a little kid seeing it if the kid's parents let them play an M-rated game. my two cents.

i personally like porn sprays... distracts people and makes 'em easier to shoot/knife in the back :)

as long as it's not racist, CP, furry, or goatse/other nasty shit, i say let them spray it. boobs ftw!

Huwajux
16 Jun 2009, 11:06am
the game's rated M for Mature, meaning 17 and up.

so it's not someone's fault for putting up porn sprays and a little kid seeing it if the kid's parents let them play an M-rated game. my two cents.
Regardless of the fact whether the game is rated mature, at the end of the day little children are still going to be playing it. At least we at SteamGamers can minimize the risk of this happening by prohibiting this stuff from being on our servers, which I feel to be perfectly acceptable.

Shadowex3
16 Jun 2009, 02:03pm
Who's this "we"? "We" the steamgamers play here BECAUSE it's one of the few communities that doesn't predictably, pointlessly, and pretentiously pander to the whims of self-censoring ZOMG TINK OF TEH CHRILDEN fuddites who convince themselves that every time a child who should not be playing this game to begin with sees boobies or hears someone say a bad bad word 60 orphanages are burned down. You're going to traumatize them a hell of a lot more in telling them how horrific what they saw was than in them seeing it to begin with.

The last thing the internet needs is ANOTHER slay-on-swear no bad words, no sprays, blood disabled, ragdolls disabled daycare replacement server.

If you really want to protect kids, and we're talking REAL kids here not ~13+ when they know what sex is and want it, stop acting as an enabler for their parents. Force them to touch the little bugger now and then, he'll thank them for it later.

Huwajux
16 Jun 2009, 02:19pm
Who's this "we"? "We" the steamgamers play here BECAUSE it's one of the few communities that doesn't predictably, pointlessly, and pretentiously pander to the whims of self-censoring ZOMG TINK OF TEH CHRILDEN fuddites who convince themselves that every time a child who should not be playing this game to begin with sees boobies or hears someone say a bad bad word 60 orphanages are burned down. You're going to traumatize them a hell of a lot more in telling them how horrific what they saw was than in them seeing it to begin with.

The last thing the internet needs is ANOTHER slay-on-swear no bad words, no sprays, blood disabled, ragdolls disabled daycare replacement server.

If you really want to protect kids, and we're talking REAL kids here not ~13+ when they know what sex is and want it, stop acting as an enabler for their parents. Force them to touch the little bugger now and then, he'll thank them for it later.
We is in reference to the admins. Nude sprays are acceptable, whereas more serious stuff isn't. However, you forget that we are not just taking into account hardcore porn sprays, we are keeping all the nasty shock value images off the servers too. There are a bunch of young kids under 13 that play our servers, some of which are my friends, and I really wouldn't want them looking at some cartoon of a naked woman having her body mutilated by a variety of instruments, heck I wouldn't want anyone seeing that shit.

Don't maximise your rage bar and go berserk on me. You're being completely pessimistic, misanthropic and a general douche suddenly. I must warn you that these are all common symptoms of a troll; don't let it come to that.

Dracula
16 Jun 2009, 02:22pm
Who's this "we"? "We" the steamgamers play here BECAUSE it's one of the few communities that doesn't predictably, pointlessly, and pretentiously pander to the whims of self-censoring ZOMG TINK OF TEH CHRILDEN fuddites who convince themselves that every time a child who should not be playing this game to begin with sees boobies or hears someone say a bad bad word 60 orphanages are burned down. You're going to traumatize them a hell of a lot more in telling them how horrific what they saw was than in them seeing it to begin with.

The last thing the internet needs is ANOTHER slay-on-swear no bad words, no sprays, blood disabled, ragdolls disabled daycare replacement server.

If you really want to protect kids, and we're talking REAL kids here not ~13+ when they know what sex is and want it, stop acting as an enabler for their parents. Force them to touch the little bugger now and then, he'll thank them for it later.

Its called White Knight Sydrome, and many people in SG seem to have caught it.

tinkerbell
16 Jun 2009, 02:29pm
Who's this "we"? "We" the steamgamers play here BECAUSE it's one of the few communities that doesn't predictably, pointlessly, and pretentiously pander to the whims of self-censoring ZOMG THINK OF TEH CHRILDEN fuddites who convince themselves that every time a child who should not be playing this game to begin with sees boobies or hears someone say a bad bad word 60 orphanages are burned down. You're going to traumatize them a hell of a lot more in telling them how horrific what they saw was than in them seeing it to begin with.

The last thing the internet needs is ANOTHER slay-on-swear no bad words, no sprays, blood disabled, ragdolls disabled daycare replacement server.

If you really want to protect kids, and we're talking REAL kids here not ~13+ when they know what sex is and want it, stop acting as an enabler for their parents. Force them to touch the little bugger now and then, he'll thank them for it later.

thanks, didnt want anyone finding out

Shadowex3
16 Jun 2009, 02:43pm
Don't maximise your rage bar and go berserk on me. You're being completely pessimistic, misanthropic and a general douche suddenly. I must warn you that these are all common symptoms of a troll; don't let it come to that.

And yet you're the one calling me a pessimistic, misanthropic douche and a troll. The first rule of trolling is always accuse someone else of what you yourself are most guilty of because supposedly they then will be unable to call you out on it. Unfortunately that doesn't actually work as well online as it does in meatspace.

Your lack of clarity when using the general pronoun of "this stuff" in a post with a quotebox which contains the general description of "porn sprays" is not a reflection on me.


Its called White Knight Sydrome, and many people in SG seem to have caught it.

Nah, very few I'd say. It's just that those few tend to be very loud sometimes and we forget just how many people there are here. I mean right now there's 41 people on and 203 people have visited so far today, at least half of either of those tend to be admin positions and if you look the people who get the most up in arms about this sort of thing are really not the ones you'd expect. I mean I've played when some admins were on with their kids before and they didn't care about porn THEN since A) you can disable sprays being visible clientside and B) it's just boobies.

Which is incidentally my other point that I forgot to mention, anyone letting their kids play this game can just turn off sprays. Rather than force us to accomodate outrageous circumstances it makes more sense to assume that they just turned sprays off along with blood+gore in the parental controls.

Huwajux
17 Jun 2009, 06:41am
And yet you're the one calling me a pessimistic, misanthropic douche and a troll. The first rule of trolling is always accuse someone else of what you yourself are most guilty of because supposedly they then will be unable to call you out on it. Unfortunately that doesn't actually work as well online as it does in meatspace.

Your lack of clarity when using the general pronoun of "this stuff" in a post with a quotebox which contains the general description of "porn sprays" is not a reflection on me.
Attack me all you want. You display the aforementioned traits in almost every post you make. You belittle our community and try to patronise both the admins and higher ups within it; usually when things do not go the way you want them to. Try showing some respect and be more understanding in your posts.

I don't care if I have the white knight syndrome or not, it isn't necessary for you to display such arrogance towards people. Keep it up and you'll end up being like Hazardous, AppleShark or even Speed (personality wise). I'm done with this thread, mock me or try and make me look stupid all you want. I've had my fill of you type of individuals. Good day.

andre1028
17 Jun 2009, 11:04am
:doh:

and I thought I've seen it all.

Shadowex3
17 Jun 2009, 12:29pm
Attack me all you want. You display the aforementioned traits in almost every post you make. You belittle our community and try to patronise both the admins and higher ups within it; usually when things do not go the way you want them to. Try showing some respect and be more understanding in your posts.

I don't care if I have the white knight syndrome or not, it isn't necessary for you to display such arrogance towards people. Keep it up and you'll end up being like Hazardous, AppleShark or even Speed (personality wise). I'm done with this thread, mock me or try and make me look stupid all you want. I've had my fill of you type of individuals. Good day.

For those that haven't spent 12 years studying and dissecting sophistry and logical fallacies:

Personal attacks on me in red and threats are in yellow. Framing, the clever use of words in order to sway listeners and to just plain set up someone whether it's true or not, is in blue.

Here's how it works (assuming it does): You start out having the idea presented that Huwajux is being attacked. That automatically is supposed to slip in and "frame" the issue in terms of me vs huwajux, with me set up as the bad guy and huwajux the innocent victim. From there the listener is already supposedly swayed and is more readily accepting of personal attacks on me which are carefully chosen to be things which are actually unquantifiable and by nature AND are applicable to everyone. Claiming that I belittle the community makes it personal for any reader and thus sets up the following fallacy.

From there you reinforce that with claiming I display "such arrogance towards people" because that is also an unquantifiable and general thing that can be made personal. With this anyone who reads this and was ever even slightly miffed at a disagreement with me will think "Oh yeah, he IS an arrogant sombiatch, and its because he hates the whole community". It polarizes the situation in the listener's mind.

Now that you've established me as an ebil ebil man that hates all of steamgamers and is just so mean to everyone all the time you back up that righteous anger with a threat. That encourages the listener to join the cause and attack me as well because, after all, I've got it coming to me.

From there you cement the one-dimensional framing of the situation by setting up Huwajux as being the better man whose walking away from my ebil mean attacks and also, as I already stated, attempts to claim I'm doing what he is most guilty or afraid of in an attempt to head off any chance of calling him out on it. Think of it like james bond, if you accuse someone else of being james bond then his attempt at accusing you (the real james bond) of being a spy is suddenly very hollow even though it's true.


And there you have it folks, the anatomy of the use of logical fallacies in a forumposting and just how significantly they can affect the perception of individuals in a thread. Think about it and you realise how tricky it is. Even though my original post is right there and it's immediately obvious that I haven't said ANYTHING about huwa other than directly quoting his own words and pointing out the james bond thing it's suddenly so much easier to read his post and think I'm the one that's attacking him when in fact I've literally said nothing at all about him while being called:

1. Pessimistic
2. Misanthropic
3. Troll
4. Douche
5. Arrogant
6. Belittle the community
7. Patronise the admins and higher ups

So. Even if you don't count the last 2 (and to be fair they are a bit of a stretch to count as outright insults) you are still left with me literally having said nothing about huwajux and huwajux having openly insulted me with 5 seperate things, but nonetheless may have a subconscious (or not so subconscious) desire to jump to defend him from ME and not the other way around.

THAT is the power of logical fallacies. Knowing how to argue logically doesn't do much for you, knowing how to short circuit perfectly rational people's brains on the other hand will get you a mob with pitchforks and torches at your disposal any time you want.

Nighthawk
17 Jun 2009, 01:05pm
as a conservative- let me say that i dont like porn sprays- they are immoral- and annyoing

Dracula
17 Jun 2009, 01:06pm
For those that haven't spent 12 years studying and dissecting sophistry and logical fallacies:

Personal attacks on me in red and threats are in yellow. Framing, the clever use of words in order to sway listeners and to just plain set up someone whether it's true or not, is in blue.

Here's how it works (assuming it does): You start out having the idea presented that Huwajux is being attacked. That automatically is supposed to slip in and "frame" the issue in terms of me vs huwajux, with me set up as the bad guy and huwajux the innocent victim. From there the listener is already supposedly swayed and is more readily accepting of personal attacks on me which are carefully chosen to be things which are actually unquantifiable and by nature AND are applicable to everyone. Claiming that I belittle the community makes it personal for any reader and thus sets up the following fallacy.

From there you reinforce that with claiming I display "such arrogance towards people" because that is also an unquantifiable and general thing that can be made personal. With this anyone who reads this and was ever even slightly miffed at a disagreement with me will think "Oh yeah, he IS an arrogant sombiatch, and its because he hates the whole community". It polarizes the situation in the listener's mind.

Now that you've established me as an ebil ebil man that hates all of steamgamers and is just so mean to everyone all the time you back up that righteous anger with a threat. That encourages the listener to join the cause and attack me as well because, after all, I've got it coming to me.

From there you cement the one-dimensional framing of the situation by setting up Huwajux as being the better man whose walking away from my ebil mean attacks and also, as I already stated, attempts to claim I'm doing what he is most guilty or afraid of in an attempt to head off any chance of calling him out on it. Think of it like james bond, if you accuse someone else of being james bond then his attempt at accusing you (the real james bond) of being a spy is suddenly very hollow even though it's true.


And there you have it folks, the anatomy of the use of logical fallacies in a forumposting and just how significantly they can affect the perception of individuals in a thread. Think about it and you realise how tricky it is. Even though my original post is right there and it's immediately obvious that I haven't said ANYTHING about huwa other than directly quoting his own words and pointing out the james bond thing it's suddenly so much easier to read his post and think I'm the one that's attacking him when in fact I've literally said nothing at all about him while being called:

1. Pessimistic
2. Misanthropic
3. Troll
4. Douche
5. Arrogant
6. Belittle the community
7. Patronise the admins and higher ups

So. Even if you don't count the last 2 (and to be fair they are a bit of a stretch to count as outright insults) you are still left with me literally having said nothing about huwajux and huwajux having openly insulted me with 5 seperate things, but nonetheless may have a subconscious (or not so subconscious) desire to jump to defend him from ME and not the other way around.

THAT is the power of logical fallacies. Knowing how to argue logically doesn't do much for you, knowing how to short circuit perfectly rational people's brains on the other hand will get you a mob with pitchforks and torches at your disposal any time you want.

:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::c lap:

Suri
17 Jun 2009, 01:46pm
And that's where people need to do a reality check and look at the number on the side of the game.

I am sure I am walking into a battle field here with what I have read. But it annoys me when I hear people say read the number on the box. That is a guide and not a rule/law. Just because it says Mature 17+ does not mean jack. That is only listed as a guide for parents. Not that parents even bother to look at those any way.

The rule is simple in the servers. There is nothing it bitch about. If an admin ask you to change your Spray because they feel it to be offending then just change it. It's very simple.

trakaill
17 Jun 2009, 03:39pm
There is nothing it bitch about. If an admin ask you to change your Spray because they feel it to be offending then just change it. It's very simple.

That is taken way out of context by some of your admins! Ive seen someone get kicked for having a spray that didnt even show boobs...
A few others are WAY over the top with the nudity bs! I can name some of top of my head..

I really would like to access some of the clean server advocates computer...if your claiming you dont watch porn then I laugh!!
Do you realize how easy accessible porn is???? If you think a lil square in css is going to influence a kid mind then you are wrong..I dont know what you people are trying to prove but its ridiculous!
You all need to stop trying to be internet super heroes and chill the fuck out

not only that but boobs are awesome!!! unless your gay I dont see what the fuck is the problem!

Shadowex3
17 Jun 2009, 04:14pm
For the record I don't care, as long as the admin follows the rule in asking first and doing so without throwing a hissy fit in the process I'll follow it till they leave or get overruled.

Nighthawk
20 Jun 2009, 06:09pm
The problem is that most of us like chosing when/if we want to see porn. When you spray porn- we don't get that option. If I don't want to see it- either because I have a wife, or because I find it immoral- I have a right to not have to.

PS: I find it immoral and it would be hard to explain to my parents if they walked in with porn on a jail wall...

Shadowex3
21 Jun 2009, 02:51am
Turn sprays off, or don't look at it. You have a choice to ignore it as well.

Caution
21 Jun 2009, 09:40am
The problem is that most of us like chosing when/if we want to see porn. When you spray porn- we don't get that option. If I don't want to see it- either because I have a wife, or because I find it immoral- I have a right to not have to.

PS: I find it immoral and it would be hard to explain to my parents if they walked in with porn on a jail wall...

I don't understand why threads like these are still getting posts when the answers have been said.

That's fine that you find porn / nudity / whatever "immoral," but realize that others do not at the same time. When playing counter-strike, there are a few things bound to happen, and among those are porn sprays and constant swearing. You know that you take the risk of dealing with each when you play on our servers.

Like Shadow said, turn sprays off. Everybody wins.

PingPong
21 Jun 2009, 11:15am
God if this rule wasnt in place i think wed all go crazy, i have seen some REALLY fucked up sprays :S

sheriff
21 Jun 2009, 12:28pm
God if this rule wasnt in place i think wed all go crazy, i have seen some REALLY fucked up sprays :S

goatse ftw

Shadowex3
21 Jun 2009, 08:57pm
Anything super nublet had, one of the admins used to have a Well Hung guy iirc, and there used to be a mystery dude that had a suprisingly well animated and high resolution meatspin spray.

Zargotelc
21 Jun 2009, 09:26pm
Who's this "we"? "We" the steamgamers play here BECAUSE it's one of the few communities that doesn't predictably, pointlessly, and pretentiously pander to the whims of self-censoring ZOMG TINK OF TEH CHRILDEN fuddites who convince themselves that every time a child who should not be playing this game to begin with sees boobies or hears someone say a bad bad word 60 orphanages are burned down. You're going to traumatize them a hell of a lot more in telling them how horrific what they saw was than in them seeing it to begin with.

The last thing the internet needs is ANOTHER slay-on-swear no bad words, no sprays, blood disabled, ragdolls disabled daycare replacement server.

If you really want to protect kids, and we're talking REAL kids here not ~13+ when they know what sex is and want it, stop acting as an enabler for their parents. Force them to touch the little bugger now and then, he'll thank them for it later.


the game's rated M for Mature, meaning 17 and up.

so it's not someone's fault for putting up porn sprays and a little kid seeing it if the kid's parents let them play an M-rated game. my two cents.

i personally like porn sprays... distracts people and makes 'em easier to shoot/knife in the back :)

as long as it's not racist, CP, furry, or goatse/other nasty shit, i say let them spray it. boobs ftw!

Joining in late here but these were both acceptable posts. I don't have a problem with porn as long as it isn't putrid or disgusting enough, the majority of us are mature individuals. I remember playing in 1.6 way back in the day, as a teen I saw a porn spray on dust. Wasn't a big deal.

Shadowex3
22 Jun 2009, 11:27am
I saw porn sprays on dust too as a teen. I also saw lots and lots of porn online as a teen. Repeatedly.

Red
22 Jun 2009, 12:41pm
Damn this thread is long.

Racist sprays/child porn are the only sprays that are restricted at all time, other sprays are at the discretion of the admins who are on the server at the time.

inb4lock