View Poll Results: should AFK's be punished for not following orders

Voters
3. You may not vote on this poll
  • add rule

    2 66.67%
  • dont add rue

    1 33.33%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Huwajux is offline
    Huwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for rep

    Join Date
    23 Mar 2008
    Location
    England, London
    Posts
    4,267
    Thanks
    600
    Thanked
    1,526 in 625 Posts

    Prison Break AFKs

    Basically what is being debated over in this thread. This AFK crap has always been one of the problems in the ever-growing list of rules for prison break. Personally I think it makes it a lot harder for the guards to do their job. It forces them make sure the cells are closed and that any cells with guns in them are empty. If they don't then they face the risk of a random backstab or bullet in the back of the head.

    Another key issue in relation to this is that people abuse the system, if the admin on at the time disallows the killing of AFKs then people take advantage of this by faking it and trying to get a cheap kill. It completely undermines the notion that prisoners must rebel at the appropriate time whilst being ordered around. Instead we get random prisoners backstabbing some oblivious guard and ending the round in less than a minute.

    I would like to see this 'admin discretion' thing removed, and in it's place the following rule added.

    "If prisoners do not follow orders, punish them accordingly. This includes AFKs."

    Edit: Goddamn add a poll please.

  2. #2
    Crimson is offline
    Banned Banned
    Crimson has a brilliant futureCrimson has a brilliant futureCrimson has a brilliant futureCrimson has a brilliant futureCrimson has a brilliant futureCrimson has a brilliant futureCrimson has a brilliant futureCrimson has a brilliant futureCrimson has a brilliant futureCrimson has a brilliant futureCrimson has a brilliant future

    Join Date
    20 May 2008
    Location
    Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    5,452
    Thanks
    432
    Thanked
    571 in 323 Posts
    Support, yous noob forgettin yo poll

  3. #3
    Beth is offline
    mooofinz. ^_^
    Beth begs for repBeth begs for repBeth begs for repBeth begs for repBeth begs for repBeth begs for repBeth begs for repBeth begs for repBeth begs for repBeth begs for repBeth begs for rep

    Join Date
    20 Sep 2008
    Location
    A boring place.
    Posts
    5,134
    Thanks
    401
    Thanked
    1,343 in 533 Posts
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: RAWRxbethhh Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:17870527
    I agree with you. If they are AFK, that's their loss.


  4. #4
    Third is offline
    Server Administrator
    Third has a brilliant futureThird has a brilliant futureThird has a brilliant futureThird has a brilliant futureThird has a brilliant futureThird has a brilliant futureThird has a brilliant futureThird has a brilliant futureThird has a brilliant futureThird has a brilliant futureThird has a brilliant future

    Join Date
    22 Mar 2008
    Location
    London, United Kingdom.
    Posts
    689
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked
    49 in 25 Posts
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: SG Third
    I'm all for killing the AFKs - I give them 3 warnings (verbal) & 1 typed.
    Then *pop in the head*

    ::: [SG] Third ::: Private Message Me ::: Bite Me :::


  5. #5
    Tyrant is offline
    The Bad Ol' Tyrant
    Tyrant has a brilliant futureTyrant has a brilliant futureTyrant has a brilliant futureTyrant has a brilliant futureTyrant has a brilliant futureTyrant has a brilliant futureTyrant has a brilliant futureTyrant has a brilliant futureTyrant has a brilliant futureTyrant has a brilliant futureTyrant has a brilliant future

    Join Date
    20 Jul 2008
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    462
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    19 in 17 Posts
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: AquariusLibra Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:18035662
    I'm with Third, I will warn the T who is afk and if they do not respond, they die. If someone wants to go afk I believe they should join the spectators as it can hold up the game or lead to an unfair advantage for the Ts so I have no problem letting CTs kill them. Besides, being in your cell when ordered to go somewhere else would be considered not following CT orders and should end up with them dead anywho.

  6. #6
    tinkerbell is offline
    tinkerbell has a brilliant futuretinkerbell has a brilliant futuretinkerbell has a brilliant futuretinkerbell has a brilliant futuretinkerbell has a brilliant futuretinkerbell has a brilliant futuretinkerbell has a brilliant futuretinkerbell has a brilliant futuretinkerbell has a brilliant futuretinkerbell has a brilliant futuretinkerbell has a brilliant future

    Join Date
    16 May 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,676
    Thanks
    245
    Thanked
    252 in 148 Posts
    poll added
    (|) Share the Love | | Share the Music (|)


  7. Thanked by 1 user: Huwajux (31 Jan 2010)

  8. #7
    Jaffa is offline

    Jaffa is teh ossim.Jaffa is teh ossim.Jaffa is teh ossim.Jaffa is teh ossim.Jaffa is teh ossim.Jaffa is teh ossim.Jaffa is teh ossim.Jaffa is teh ossim.Jaffa is teh ossim.Jaffa is teh ossim.Jaffa is teh ossim.

    Join Date
    18 Sep 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    4,182
    Thanks
    84
    Thanked
    523 in 237 Posts
    An admin should simply move them to spec if they are afk

    Don't see why we need a rule allowing cts to kills ts in their cells

  9. #8
    Huwajux is offline
    Huwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for rep

    Join Date
    23 Mar 2008
    Location
    England, London
    Posts
    4,267
    Thanks
    600
    Thanked
    1,526 in 625 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
    An admin should simply move them to spec if they are afk

    Don't see why we need a rule allowing cts to kills ts in their cells
    Unnecessary hassle. Simply remove the allowance of AFKs and people will sort it out by themselves.

  10. #9
    Huwajux is offline
    Huwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for repHuwajux begs for rep

    Join Date
    23 Mar 2008
    Location
    England, London
    Posts
    4,267
    Thanks
    600
    Thanked
    1,526 in 625 Posts
    Anymore opinions or a verdict?

  11. #10
    mNote is online now
    mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!mNote IS OVER 9000!!!!!!

    Join Date
    1 Mar 2007
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    1,597
    Thanks
    152
    Thanked
    346 in 113 Posts
    There shouldn't be an admin discretion regarding AFKs. If you're AFK, you're better off dead.


    You set the standard, you keep the standard.


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts